BGIPU logo Inter-Parliamentary Union BRITISH GROUP  
 
   
     
  Print this page print

Delegation Reports

Report on election observing in Mongolia

18 to 21 September 2009

Report by John Grogan

Delegate
John Grogan MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Mongolia

I visited Ulaanbaatar in Mongolia over the weekend of 18 to 21 September 2009 to observe the parliamentary by-election in the Chingeltei district. The visit was sponsored by the British Group of the IPU.

This by-election was significant because it was the first by-election since the General Election in 2008. On that occasion, after the then leader of the Opposition questioned the validity of the result, riots followed, six people were killed and the building of the Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party was burned down. The political establishment and indeed the country as a whole were shocked by these developments because elections had been generally peaceful since the introduction of democracy following the withdrawal of the Russians in the early 1990s.

In 2008, a Government of National Unity was formed. The by-election I observed was caused by the election to the presidency of one of the incumbent MPs for the area some months earlier.

Mongolia now has a majoritarian system with on average three MPs representing each constituency (similar to the system operated in many English local councils).

The Chingeltei district has 71,742 voters on the electoral roll with 23 polling stations. Fourteen of the polling stations had a majority of the electorate coming from the Ger districts on the edge of the city. I visited a wide range of the polling stations.

It is a feature of the Mongolian system that the polling stations are staffed by party supporters rather than civil servants. Each polling station has a local election commission with the Chairman coming from one of the parties and the Secretary from the other.

There were eight candidates in the by-election and all had their representatives in the polling station either observing or helping to administer the poll. Everybody appeared to be particularly proud of a new digital technology system which for the first time held the list of voters and details of their registration.

Previously the voters’ list had been prepared by hand and there had been documented cases of individuals being registered and voting more than once in the same constituency.

At this election, the voters had to bring not just their identity cards but also a voter’s certificate carrying a special control code to match the state registration number of the citizen.

The polls were open from 7am to 10pm, and after the poll closed the ballots were counted in each individual polling station. The results were then phoned in to a central control. Surveillance cameras were installed at each polling station.

In the end, the turnout was 62.12% with 44,563 voters; 513 ballot papers were spoilt.

The result represented a significant victory for the MPRP. The candidate was the Minister for Energy who had recently signed an agreement with international mining firms including Rio Tinto.

Ministers do not have to be Members of Parliament but about a third of them are. His victory represented a gain from the Democrat Party and was accepted without question.

Candidate

Votes

 

 

Mr.Zorigt.D (MPRP)

26,592

Ms.Burmaa (Democrat Party)

13,027

Ms.Uyanga (Independent)

2,010

Mr.Javkhlan (Independent)

1,690

Mr.Arslan (Fair Citizen's Front)

300

Tumurbataar (Independent)

159

Mr.Tumursukh (Freedom Implementing Party)

124

Mr.Jargalsaikhan (Republican Party)

114

My conclusion was that the casting and counting of ballots were fair and that voter identification was now perhaps more rigorous than in the United Kingdom.

Nevertheless, the absence of limits of expenditure by individual candidates or the parties meant that there were some allegations of votes being bought. This was difficult to assess although I heard some anecdotal evidence of individuals receiving money for voting a particular way and proving their vote by taking a mobile phone into the polling station and taking a discreet photo of their completed ballot paper. A robust law against ‘treating’ might be one way forward.

Latest News
Parliamentary Hearing at the United Nations, November 2011
Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Republic of Korea,
November 2011 >>
Outward delegation to Kosovo,
November 2011 >>
Kosovo on the brink,
November 2011 >>
The way forward in Kosovo,
November 2011 >>
WTO Public Forum, WTO HQ, Geneva,
September 2011 >>
All Party Parliamentary Group for Latin America,
2010-2011 Report >>
IPU Delegation from Mexico,
July 2011 >>
Outward Delegation to Chile,
July 2011 >>
124th IPU Assembly, Panama City, Panama,
April 2011 >>
2011 Session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO, Geneva,
March 2011 >>
Robert Walter MP leads Britain’s delegation to the IPU Assembly in Panama >>
Delegation from China, led by the Vice-Chair of the National People’s Congress,
March 2011 >>
Delegation from North Korea,
March 2011 >>
Parliamentary meeting on the occasion of the 55th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women, New York,
February 2011 >>
Outward Delegation to Georgia,
February 2011 >>
Regional Seminar on Youth Participation in Politics,
December 2010 >>
IPU Parliamentary Hearing at the United Nations,
December 2010 >>
Parliamentary delegation from Tajikistan,
November 2010 >>
Outward Delegation to Uruguay,
November 2010 >>
Outward Delegation to Turkey,
November 2010 >>
APPCG Delegation to Shanghai and Beijing,
October 2010 >>
Outward delegation to Angola,
September 2010 >>
New MPs join the British Group of the IPU >>
Legislative aspects of HIV relating to key affected populations,
20 July 2010>>
Visit of a Parliamentary delegation from Albania, 16 to 17 March 2010>>
Parliamentary Delegation from Afghanistan, 25 to 29 January 2010>>
Congo-UK Friendship Group visit,
January 2010 >>